[Python-Dev] Proposal to revert r54204 (splitext change) (original) (raw)
Phillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Fri Mar 16 02:39:23 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal to revert r54204 (splitext change)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal to revert r54204 (splitext change)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 10:39 PM 3/15/2007 +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
That said, if it makes people more comfortable with having a warning added, I won't object. It's just that I don't want to be the one to take the blame for issuing the warning, because deep in my heart I feel that warnings are a bad thing, unless they are right most of the time (which they won't be in this case).
Some other options:
Deprecate splitext() and remove it in 3.0
Add an optional flag argument to enable the new behavior
Create a new function with the new behavior (as you proposed the last time there was a patch submitted for this)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal to revert r54204 (splitext change)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal to revert r54204 (splitext change)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]