[Python-Dev] I vote to reject: Adding timeout to socket.py and httplib.py. (original) (raw)
Steven Bethard steven.bethard at gmail.com
Wed Mar 21 15:01:17 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] I vote to reject: Adding timeout to socket.py and httplib.py.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] I vote to reject: Adding timeout to socket.py and httplib.py.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/21/07, Facundo Batista <facundo at taniquetil.com.ar> wrote:
So, as a resume of the choices we still need to settle:
a) Repeat the same functionality in 5 other libraries b) Write the function in socket.py, public c) Write the function in socket.py, non public
The fact that it's needed in 5 places in the stdlib suggests that there's plenty of user code that could benefit from it too. Hence, I prefer (b), but if that really freaks people out, I'm okay with (c) too. I'm not okay with (a).
Thanks, by the way, for creating this patch (and updating it based on python-dev feedback). I think it's really important for the maintainability of Python that duplicate code is factored out whenever possible.
STeVe
I'm not in-sane. Indeed, I am so far out of sane that you appear a tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity. --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] I vote to reject: Adding timeout to socket.py and httplib.py.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] I vote to reject: Adding timeout to socket.py and httplib.py.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]