[Python-Dev] string representation of range in 3.0 (original) (raw)
Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Thu Apr 17 04:49:02 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] string representation of range in 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] unittest's redundant assertions: asserts vs. failIf/Unlesses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote in message news:ca471dc20804161420o5e51978csdf99d2427f328c5b at mail.gmail.com... | Why only str()? Note that the interactive prompt uses repr() to display values.
I was under the impression that for range, you still wanted to maintain the
distinction between an evalable and a friendly representation. If not,
then ok, but I would then almost wonder whether to have both functions --
until I remember the reason for two versions of string representation and
your proposal (which I approve of) for both a full and abbreviated rep for
classes.
|
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] string representation of range in 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] unittest's redundant assertions: asserts vs. failIf/Unlesses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]