[Python-Dev] Return type of round, floor, and ceil in 2.6 (original) (raw)
Facundo Batista facundobatista at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 13:30:30 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Return type of round, floor, and ceil in 2.6
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Return type of round, floor, and ceil in 2.6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2008/1/3, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com>:
I think Py2.6 and Py2.5 should be treated with more respect. Will backporting this change can only cause relief or create headaches?. By definition, the Py3.0 release was supposed to be the one big incompatible set of changes. Backporting with a goal
Well, as issue 1689 states, the backporting was commited by Jeffrey on rev 5967 [2], so this is the time to understand if we want this or not.
Personally, I'm -0.
I was involved in this because of Decimal, but I can grow some methods in it that can be in the trunk, unused, and when ported to 3k fit ok in the new infrastructure.
Regards,
[1] http://bugs.python.org/issue1689 [2] http://svn.python.org/view?rev=59671&view=rev
-- . Facundo
Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Return type of round, floor, and ceil in 2.6
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Return type of round, floor, and ceil in 2.6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]