[Python-Dev] Contributing to Python (original) (raw)
Mike Klaas mike.klaas at gmail.com
Sat Jan 5 08:45:34 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Contributing to Python
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Contributing to Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3-Jan-08, at 1:07 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 11:49 AM, Fred Drake <fdrake at acm.org> wrote:
Python 2.6 seems to be entirely targeted at people who really want to be on Python 3, but have code that will need to be ported. I certainly don't view it as interesting in it's own right. It will be though -- it will have genuine new features -- yes, backported from 3.0, but new features nevertheless, and in a compatible fashion.
I think that there are still tons of people like me for whom 3.0 is
still a future concern that is too big to devote cycles to at the
moment, but are still very much interested in improving the 2.x
series (which improves 3.0) at the same time.
I've been inspired by this thread to start working on a few 2.6 items
that I had in mind, starting with http://bugs.python.org/
issue1663329 , which mostly just needed documentation and cleanup
(now done).
Question: should patches include edits to whatsnew.rst, or is the
committer responsible for adding a note?
-Mike
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Contributing to Python
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Contributing to Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]