[Python-Dev] pkgutil, pkg_resource and Python 3.0 name space packages (original) (raw)
M.-A. Lemburg mal at egenix.com
Mon Jan 7 15:01:45 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Pydotorg] Do we need both Trac and Roundup?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pkgutil, pkg_resource and Python 3.0 name space packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2008-01-07 14:57, Fred Drake wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008, at 7:48 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Next, we add a per-user site-packages directory to the standard sys.path, and then we could get rid of most of the setuptools import and sys.path hackery, making it a lot cleaner.
PYTHONPATH already provides this functionality. I see no need to duplicate that.
Agreed, but one of the main arguments for all the .pth file hackery in setuptools is that having to change PYTHONPATH in order to enable user installations of packages is too hard for the typical user.
We could easily resolve that issue, if we add a per-user site-packages dir to sys.path in site.py (this is already done for Macs).
-- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Jan 07 2008)
Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
:::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,MacOSX for free ! ::::
eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Pydotorg] Do we need both Trac and Roundup?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pkgutil, pkg_resource and Python 3.0 name space packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]