[Python-Dev] pkgutil, pkg_resource and Python 3.0 name space packages (original) (raw)
Paul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Wed Jan 9 12:58:14 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pkgutil, pkg_resource and Python 3.0 name space packages
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pkgutil, pkg_resource and Python 3.0 name space packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 09/01/2008, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
Note today's Coding Horror blog entry: "Don't Pollute User Space"
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001032.html Keep your dirty, filthy paws out of my personal user space!
:-) Absolutely
[...]
If applications need to store shared files, that's what the \AppData and \Application Data folders are for.
Sentiments I agree with...
Yes, with the one proviso that Windows (XP, at least, maybe Vista is actually better in this regard) makes it extremely difficult for the user to manually do anything in these directories, so that I'd say this is only appropriate for fully application-maintained files. As far as I know, Windows lacks any really sensible place to store application configuration data which is meant to be user edited on occasion (e.g. rc/ini files, startup scripts, etc).
That's often what I see ending up in %USERPROFILE% - even though as Christian points out, it's "officially" wrong.
Paul.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pkgutil, pkg_resource and Python 3.0 name space packages
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pkgutil, pkg_resource and Python 3.0 name space packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]