[Python-Dev] C99 code in the Python core? (original) (raw)
Mark Dickinson dickinsm at gmail.com
Sat Jul 5 11:39:34 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues
- Next message: [Python-Dev] C99 code in the Python core?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I have a general question and a specific question. First the general one:
(1) When is it okay to use C99 code in the Python core? More particularly, is it considered acceptable to use widely-implemented library functions that are specified in C99 but not ANSI C, or widely-implemented features that are new to C99?
Or is C99 code now acceptable pretty much anywhere? If so, should PEP 7 be updated? It currently says: """Use ANSI/ISO standard C (the 1989 version of the standard)."""
I think there are some C99 features that still aren't implemented everywhere, even on major platforms. (Examples are the inverse hyperbolic trig functions in math.h.)
And the specific question:
(2) Is it okay to use the '%a' format specifier for sprintf, sscanf and friends. Are there major platforms where this isn't implemented? (Using '%a' would make the issue implementation much simpler.)
Mark
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues
- Next message: [Python-Dev] C99 code in the Python core?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]