[Python-Dev] Running Py2.6 with the -3 option (original) (raw)
Benjamin Peterson musiccomposition at gmail.com
Fri Jul 11 16:50:21 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Running Py2.6 with the -3 option
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Running Py2.6 with the -3 option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote:
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
Yes, indeed. We should make sure, however, that the changes in the 2.6 libraries are the absolute minimum to get the job done. (I'm trying to pretend like this isn't violating the prohibition on all-inclusive overhauls in the stdlib.) The prohibition is on gratuitous changes, basically along the lines of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". The stdlib is definitely broken if it raises warnings of that kind.
Just because it's massive breakage fixage doesn't mean that it's unlikely to break something else. :)
regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/musiccomposition%40gmail.com
-- Cheers, Benjamin Peterson "There's no place like 127.0.0.1."
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Running Py2.6 with the -3 option
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Running Py2.6 with the -3 option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]