[Python-Dev] PEP: Consolidating names and classes in the unittest
module (updated 2008-07-15) (original) (raw)
Ben Finney ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Wed Jul 16 00:36:56 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP: Consolidating names and classes in the `unittest` module (updated 2008-07-15)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP: Consolidating names and classes in the `unittest` module (updated 2008-07-15)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:
Terry Reedy writes:
> For the community as a whole, all stdlib modules are suggestions > and examples, not commands. Well, even if "standard" is too strong a word, the DeprecationWarnings and eventual removal of the methods surely constitute an imposition.
I understood Terry's statement as meaning that there is no commandment to use the standard library 'unittest' module at all. If a user doesn't like the behaviour of a module (such as 'unittest') in the standard library, they can accept the burden of implementing one that behaves the way they like.
-- \ “I never forget a face, but in your case I'll be glad to make | `\ an exception.” —Groucho Marx | o_) | Ben Finney
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP: Consolidating names and classes in the `unittest` module (updated 2008-07-15)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP: Consolidating names and classes in the `unittest` module (updated 2008-07-15)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]