[Python-Dev] PEP: Consolidating names and classes in the unittest
module (updated 2008-07-15) (original) (raw)
Ben Finney ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Wed Jul 16 05:06:29 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP: Consolidating names and classes in the `unittest` module (updated 2008-07-15)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP: Consolidating names and classes in the `unittest` module (updated 2008-07-15)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> writes:
(and don't tell me "fail" is not a negative word, because you just used the phrase "positive admonition" to refer to the assert* variants, which implies quite clearly that the fail* variants are on the negative side ;-))
This "fail is a negative word" has already been rebutted, by native speakers of English. If you don't want to hear "fail is not a negative word", I can't help you.
This doesn't seem to introduce anything new, so I'll leave the existing summary of this argument as is in the PEP.
-- \ “Holy unrefillable prescriptions, Batman!” —Robin | `\ | o_) | Ben Finney
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP: Consolidating names and classes in the `unittest` module (updated 2008-07-15)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP: Consolidating names and classes in the `unittest` module (updated 2008-07-15)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]