[Python-Dev] Close PEP 211? (was Re: Infix operators) (original) (raw)
Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu Jul 24 05:26:23 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Close PEP 211? (was Re: Infix operators)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Infix operators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry Reedy wrote:
Given that itertools.product(A,B) == ((x,y) for x in A for y in B) == the proposed 'A @ B' and given Guido's pronounced distaste for new infix, should this be closed?
Would there likely be any support for an alternative PEP defining @ as matrix multiplication in both Python and numpy?
-- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Close PEP 211? (was Re: Infix operators)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Infix operators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]