[Python-Dev] Any PEP about 2.6 -> 3000 code transition? (original) (raw)
Barry Scott barry at barrys-emacs.org
Fri Jul 25 00:33:46 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Any PEP about 2.6 -> 3000 code transition?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Any PEP about 2.6 -> 3000 code transition?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jul 21, 2008, at 22:37, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 20:16, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
But waiting until all the betas have gone out totally defeats the purpose of the betas! I agree. Writing an actual guide can wait, but documenting the differences with code examples is a work that can start now, and I agree that it would be great if this would start now. But writing a guide might not be a good idea until we know what the changes are, and if the API is changing quickly now we don't. :-)
I'm working on getting a version of PyCXX working with Python 3.0. The lack of any docs outside of the header files is making this a slow process.
I think its a mistake to expect a serious beta test of extensions when you have no guide to the changes in the C API.
If you had a guide then diff it between releases would be a guide to what need fixing up going from beta to beta to rc.
Oh and I'm not going to try and make a version of PyCXX that works on 2.x and 3.x as the changes are too fundamental.
Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Any PEP about 2.6 -> 3000 code transition?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Any PEP about 2.6 -> 3000 code transition?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]