[Python-Dev] PEP 371 Discussion (pyProcessing Module) (original) (raw)
Paul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Sun Jun 1 15:44:59 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 371 Discussion (pyProcessing Module)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 371 Discussion (pyProcessing Module)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2008/5/31 r. m. oudkerk <r.m.oudkerk at googlemail.com>:
I am certainly open to using lowercase/lowercasewithunderscores for all functions/methods except for Process's methods and possibly currentProcess(), but I would like some feed back on that.
I dislike mixedCase, but consistency with the rest of the library is more important - and as processing is matching the API of threading, which used mixedCase, it should follow that convention.
Wasn't there some talk of changing modules to use PEP 8 conventions (lowercase_with_underscore) as part of the Python 3.0 conversion? Did that ever happen?
Paul.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 371 Discussion (pyProcessing Module)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 371 Discussion (pyProcessing Module)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]