[Python-Dev] PEP 371 Discussion (pyProcessing Module) (original) (raw)
skip at pobox.com skip at pobox.com
Mon Jun 2 03:06:39 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 371 Discussion (pyProcessing Module)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 371 Discussion (pyProcessing Module)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick> We fixed the module names that used mixed case - the amount of
Nick> work that turned out to be involved in just doing that much for
Nick> PEP 3108 makes me shudder at the thought of trying to fix all of
Nick> the standard library APIs that currently don't follow the style
Nick> guide...
If the 3.0 API of a module is going to involve breakage which requires authors to update their applications wouldn't this be a good time to PEP-8-ify the module? (Not suggesting that threading would fall into this category.)
Skip
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 371 Discussion (pyProcessing Module)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 371 Discussion (pyProcessing Module)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]