[Python-Dev] PEP 8 and optional underscores (original) (raw)
Benjamin Peterson musiccomposition at gmail.com
Thu Jun 12 14:54:02 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 8 and optional underscores
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 8 and optional underscores
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Facundo Batista <facundobatista at gmail.com> wrote:
+1 on opting for properties in the specific cases here where it makes sense.
If you can get Guido to agree to it, I'll implement it.
I'm +1 too... but which is the normal procedure here? Should it be... 2.n : .isalive() 2.n+1 : .isalive() (deprecated), .alive (recommended) 2.n+2 : .alive
I think: 2.x isAlive() (Py3kWarning), .alive (recommended for compatibility with 3.x) 3.x .alive
-- Cheers, Benjamin Peterson "There's no place like 127.0.0.1."
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 8 and optional underscores
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 8 and optional underscores
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]