[Python-Dev] 2.6.1 and 3.0 (original) (raw)
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Wed Nov 19 16:11:32 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Issue 4195: Can't execute packages with -m in Python 2.6/3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Nov 18, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
Barry Warsaw wrote:
Actually, I've wanted to do timed releases, though I think monthly is unrealistic. Maybe every two months is about the right time frame. Timed releases are nice because everybody then knows when a patch is due, from developers to downstream consumers. From my point of view bi-monthly release are too much. For a ?.?.1 release two months are fine because several issues are found by 3rd party authors. But after that a release every quarter is sufficient. * .1 release two months after the .0 release * .2, .3, .4 and .5 release every quarter * about here the next minor release gets out * .6 and further releases after 6 months when necessary
Timed releases have a lot of advantages, and I would like to see if we
can adopt them and realize these benefits. What I like most about
them is that everyone knows what's happening when and can coordinate
efforts. Developers will know automatically (no reminders or alarms)
when the next release is happening, so they can schedule what they
want to do more easily. Release experts can block out the appropriate
time on their schedules and plan more efficiently. Downstream
consumers have a better idea of when updates are available and can
lobby for certain critical bugs to be fixed in a timely and
predictable manner.
I think 6 months is too long between releases -- it might as well not
be timed. It sounds like the Windows side is a bit of a pain, and
since we're all busy, one month is probably too soon. That's why I
proposed bi-monthly.
I really want our releases to be predictable. I don't think we have
to worry about nothing getting committed to the trees in 2 months time.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSSQspHEjvBPtnXfVAQIfwwP8DzaIge8b1rL9/zACiwZ5nOn9S5d+ng+p zjSSvDKgfxX5kEMfUQQuJgI6GIOPvUm0wsmdZnH5f5AD86/1Qz1ugsBkHXO6BWWl LEI2jNjsIU9m1icQkQSnENxJoI5BFFA9upewT1zwo9md4cErzQLiK+WQrblu1hXE GKaxW0Xrva4= =ZI9e -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] 2.6.1 and 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Issue 4195: Can't execute packages with -m in Python 2.6/3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]