[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule (original) (raw)
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Tue Sep 9 15:25:03 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Sep 9, 2008, at 3:22 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Even if I can't contribute very much at the moment, I'm still +1 to that. I doubt Python would get nice publicity if we released a 3.0 but had to tell everyone, "but don't really use it yet, it may still contain any number of showstoppers."
I completely agree. We should not release anything that's not ready.
Assuming that we all agree that 2.6 is much closer to being ready,
that gives us two options: delay 2.6 to coincide with 3.0 or split the
releases. The latter seems like the wisest choice to meet our goals.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSMZ5L3EjvBPtnXfVAQJwSQP/U7FFFI8ao5Xesf6F3QFIUMYFeISrlhof 9ynkQXAskUMelAfayGMSd2nD2+buXA7gyBWplAAEF2rtLhZ3N0+zeh/2HnqcY0b9 EtUM5shAIMlb2948IMoXlxSMplH5auBHMLYFnuPAIH9ERXsGVfyihLnUarAfzmT+ XrWfjrU62TA= =CUR4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]