[Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement (original) (raw)
skip at pobox.com skip at pobox.com
Tue Apr 7 14:14:22 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ondrej> ... while scons and other Python solutions imho encourage to
Ondrej> write full Python programs, which imho is a disadvantage for the
Ondrej> build system, as then every build system is nonstandard.Hmmm... Like distutils setup scripts?
I don't know thing one about cmake, but if it's good for the goose (building Python proper) would it be good for the gander (building extensions)?
-- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/ "XML sucks, dictionaries rock" - Dave Beazley
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]