[Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement (original) (raw)
Alexander Neundorf alex.neundorf at kitware.com
Tue Apr 7 15:08:54 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:14 PM, <skip at pobox.com> wrote:
Ondrej> ... while scons and other Python solutions imho encourage to Ondrej> write full Python programs, which imho is a disadvantage for the Ondrej> build system, as then every build system is nonstandard.
I fully agree here.
Hmmm... Like distutils setup scripts?
I don't know thing one about cmake, but if it's good for the goose (building Python proper) would it be good for the gander (building extensions)?
What is involved in building python extensions ? Can you please explain ?
Alex
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Evaluated cmake as an autoconf replacement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]