[Python-Dev] how important is setting co_filename for a module being imported to what file is set to? (original) (raw)
Fred Drake fdrake at acm.org
Mon Aug 31 23:04:25 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] how important is setting co_filename for a module being imported to what __file__ is set to?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] how important is setting co_filename for a module being imported to what __file__ is set to?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Aug 31, 2009, at 4:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
I am really not opinionated on this one. I was just pointing out that choosing a non-obvious solution generally requires good reasons to do so. The marshal format compaction sounds like premature optimization, since nobody seems to have formulated such a request.
Every time I've been bitten by the wrong co_filename values (usually
from tracebacks), changing the way marshal creates code objects to use
a values passed in has been the thing that made the most sense to me.
The feature request that's involved here, getting correct co_filename
values, can be implemented in different ways, sure. This particular
change produces the least impact in the because it doesn't change
the mutability of code objects.
I for one appreciate that, mostly because I'm simply wary of making
code objects mutable in this way having unexpected side effects in
some library.
-Fred
-- Fred Drake
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] how important is setting co_filename for a module being imported to what __file__ is set to?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] how important is setting co_filename for a module being imported to what __file__ is set to?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]