[Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 386 for addition (original) (raw)
Tarek Ziadé ziade.tarek at gmail.com
Thu Dec 10 14:20:44 CET 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 386 for addition
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 386 for addition
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Floris Bruynooghe <floris.bruynooghe at gmail.com> wrote: [..]
N.N[.N]+[{abc}N[.N]+][.postN][.devN]
Notice that the last two +'s are gone, and overall I think this is more consistent psuedo-code. That's quite readable and more consistent then the original pseudo-code, I like it.
Thanks, I have applied it. I have also added the full regular expression in the PEP so things are clearer.
Regards, Tarek
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 386 for addition
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 386 for addition
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]