[Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 386 for addition (original) (raw)
Tarek Ziadé ziade.tarek at gmail.com
Sun Dec 13 12:48:16 CET 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 386 for addition
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 386 for addition
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au> wrote:
Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek at gmail.com> writes:
I've started to add another section in the PEP to summarize this discussion but then I realized that we are already giving the answer in the PEP in the "Requisites and current status"
I made it clearer though, by adding an extra sentence with an example. Thank you. Requesite #2 : """ 2. most projects need special meaning versions for "pre-releases" (such as I don't think “most projects need” is supported by evidence. Fortunately, for the argument in the PEP, you don't need “most projects need” to be true; you only need “a significant number of projects”. It could be a small minority, but if it is a significantly large minority that still justifies addressing the need. So, change this to “a significant number of projects need” and I think it's a fair statement. Let me know if you think this is enough and addresses your concern, Thank you for working to make this a good PEP.
Done. Thanks for your help.
Tarek
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 386 for addition
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 386 for addition
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]