[Python-Dev] Pronouncement on PEP 389: argparse? (original) (raw)
Steven Bethard steven.bethard at gmail.com
Mon Dec 14 19:04:00 CET 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] First draft of "sysconfig"
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Pronouncement on PEP 389: argparse?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
So there wasn't really any more feedback on the last post of the argparse PEP other than a typo fix and another +1.
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0389/
Can I get a pronouncement? Here's a summary of the responses. (Please correct me if I misinterpreted anyone.)
Floris Bruynooghe +1
Brett Cannon +1
Nick Coghlan +1
Michael Foord +1
Yuval Greenfield +1
Doug Hellmann +1
Kevin Jacobs +1
Paul Moore +1
Jesse Noller +1
Fernando Perez +1
Jon Ribbens +1
Vinay Sajip +1
Barry Warsaw +1
Antoine Pitrou -0
Martin v. Löwis -0
M.-A. Lemburg -1
Note that I've interpreted those who were opposed to the deprecation of getopt as -0 since the PEP no longer proposes that, only the deprecation of optparse. (People who opposed optparse's deprecation are still -1.)
If there's any other information that would be helpful for a pronouncement, please let me know.
Steve
Where did you get that preposterous hypothesis? Did Steve tell you that? --- The Hiphopopotamus
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] First draft of "sysconfig"
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Pronouncement on PEP 389: argparse?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]