[Python-Dev] Pronouncement on PEP 389: argparse? (original) (raw)
Michael Foord fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Mon Dec 14 20:11:40 CET 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Pronouncement on PEP 389: argparse?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Pronouncement on PEP 389: argparse?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 14/12/2009 19:04, Ian Bicking wrote:
[snip...] Another thing I just noticed is that argparse using -v for version where optparse does not (it only adds --version); most of my scripts that use -v to mean --verbose, causing problems. Since this is a poll question on the argparse site I assume this is an outstanding question for argparse, but just generally I think that doing things the same way as optparse should be preferred when at all reasonable.
I also use -v for verbose in a few scripts (including options to unittest when run with python -m). I've seen -V as a common abbreviation for --version (I've just used this with Mono for example).
All the best,
Michael
-- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Pronouncement on PEP 389: argparse?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Pronouncement on PEP 389: argparse?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]