[Python-Dev] address manipulation in the standard lib (original) (raw)
Duncan McGreggor duncan.mcgreggor at gmail.com
Mon Jan 5 18:10:32 CET 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r68182 - in python/trunk: Lib/decimal.py Misc/NEWS
- Next message: [Python-Dev] address manipulation in the standard lib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Last Fall, Guido opened a ticket to include Google's ipaddr.py in the standard lib: http://bugs.python.org/issue3959
There has been some recent discussion on that ticket, enough so that it might benefit everyone if it was moved on to the dev list. I do recommend reading that ticket, though -- lots of good perspectives are represented.
The two libraries that are being discussed the most for possible inclusion are the following:
- http://code.google.com/p/ipaddr-py/wiki/IPAddrExmples
- http://code.google.com/p/netaddr/wiki/NetAddrExamples
The most immediately obvious differences between the two are:
- ipaddr supports subnet/supernet/net exclusions
- netaddr supports EUI/MAC address manipulations
- the netaddr API differentiates between an IP and a CIDR block
- netaddr supports wildcard notation
- netaddr supports binary representations of addresses
- ipaddr is one module whereas netaddr consists of several (as well as IANA data for such things as vendor lookups on MAC addresses)
- ipaddr benchmarks as faster than netaddr
- netaddr is currently PEP-8 compliant
That's a quick proto-assessment based on looking at examples and unit tests and didn't include a thorough evaluation of the code itself.
Martin provided some very nice guidelines in a comment on the ticket:
"I think Guido's original message summarizes [what we need]: a module that fills a gap for address manipulations... In addition, it should have all the organisational qualities (happy user base, determined maintainers, copyright forms, documentation, tests). As to what precisely its API should be - that is for the experts (i.e. you) to determine. I personally think performance is important, in addition to a well-designed, useful API. Conformance to PEP 8 is also desirable."
I'm planning to chat with both David Moss (netaddr) and Peter Moody (ipaddr) on the mail lists about API details, and I encourage others to do this as well. As for this list, it's probably important to define the limits of the desired feature set for an ip address manipulation library:
- do we want to limit it to IP (i.e. no EUI/MAC support)?
- do we want a single module or is a package acceptable?
- what features would folks consider essential or highly desirable (details on this will be discussed on the project mail lists)
- other thoughts?
d
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r68182 - in python/trunk: Lib/decimal.py Misc/NEWS
- Next message: [Python-Dev] address manipulation in the standard lib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]