[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch (original) (raw)
Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Fri Jan 30 04:06:13 CET 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 19:03, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
Brett Cannon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 18:27, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
There are potential problems with doing it that way [1]. The safer option is to do:
svn revert . svnmerge merge -M -F I still don't see the potential problem. If you do svnmerge, svn commit, all is fine, right? The problem only arises if you do svnmerge, svn up, svn commit - and clearly, you shouldn't do that. If, on commit, you get a conflict, you should revert all your changes, svn up, and start all over with the merge. I did do that and I still got conflicts. What is "that"? "svn revert -R" (plus rm for all added files), "svn up", "svnmerge", "svn revert ."?
svn up svnmerge ... conflicts svn revert -R . svn up svnmerge ... same conflicts
What conflicts?
Some metadata on '.'.
-Brett
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]