[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Jan 31 06:00:49 CET 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
See above. You claim that doing things the way I recommend will lose metadata; I believe this claim is false.
I can see how "svn resolved ." gets it right (now that I understand how the conflict is being produced and then fixed automatically by svnmerge, but not actually marked as resolved).
I still don't understand how "svn revert ." can avoid losing the metadata changes unless svnmerge is told to modify the properties again after they have been reverted. Or am I misunderstanding SVN, and the revert command doesn't actually revert property changes?
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]