[Python-Dev] [Fwd: Re: PEP 384: Defining a Stable ABI] (original) (raw)
William Reade william at resolversystems.com
Fri May 22 12:33:02 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Fwd: Re: PEP 384: Defining a Stable ABI]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] IronPython specific code in inspect module
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
William Reade wrote:
2) Since it hasn't always been in place, its introduction won't help me in the short term: there are an awful lot of extension modules that use excluded functions (for example, all(?) PyCxx modules use PyCodeNew and PyFrameNew to get nicer tracebacks), and I'll still have to handle all these cases until everyone is up-to-date with whatever version of Python this gets accepted into. It seems that where I should have said Pyrex, I actually said PyCxx. Sorry for the confusion. Thanks to Barry Scott for pointing it out.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Fwd: Re: PEP 384: Defining a Stable ABI]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] IronPython specific code in inspect module
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]