[Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line? (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Tue Nov 3 19:39:56 CET 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:37 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
(and no, adding things like nonlocal to 2.7 doesn't making porting of a real application or library any easier, since the existing application or library simply doesn't use that keyword.
Agreed.
In fact, no change to 2.x can reasonably simplify porting - only changes to 3.x might - except for changes to 2to3, which can simplify porting a lot. But 2to3 should be run under 3.x, IMO.)
Disagreed. Better "-3" warnings could make porting easier. (Not just more warnings -- "better" might mean fewer false positives for warnings already issued.)
FWIW, it doesn't sound like killing 2.7 is a productive thing to do. However making 2.7 the end of the line (though with indefinite bugfix releases) might be. (Indefinite != infinite.)
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]