[Python-Dev] POSIX [Fuzziness in io module specs] (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Sat Sep 19 19:04:13 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] POSIX [Fuzziness in io module specs]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] POSIX [Fuzziness in io module specs]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello,
Pascal Chambon <pythoniks gmail.com> writes:
@pitrou: non-blocking IO in python ? which ones are you thinking about ?
I was talking about the existing support for non-blocking IO in the FileIO class (look up EAGAIN in fileio.c), as well as in the Buffered* objects.
If it's too late to modify the IO API, too bad, but I don't feel comfortable with the "truncate" word.
It's certainly too late to modify the IO API only for naming purposes.
And I don't like the fact that we move the filepointer to prevent it from exceeding the file size,
I don't see what you mean:
with open('foobar', 'wb') as f: ... f.truncate(0) ... 0 os.stat('foobar').stsize 0 with open('foobar', 'wb') as f: ... f.truncate(16) ... f.tell() ... 16 16 os.stat('foobar').stsize 16
I had the feeling that IOErrors were for operations on file streams (opening, writing/reading, closing...), whereas OSErrors were for manipulations on filesystems (renaming, linking, stating...) and processes.
Ok, but the distinction is certainly fuzzy in many cases. I have no problem with trying to change the corner cases you mention, though.
Regards
Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] POSIX [Fuzziness in io module specs]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] POSIX [Fuzziness in io module specs]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]