[Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review. (original) (raw)
Daniel Stutzbach daniel at stutzbachenterprises.com
Mon Sep 28 17:01:38 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:35 AM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com>wrote:
A little googling produced this hit:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mip4/draft-ietf-mip4-nemo-v4-base/draft-ietf-mip4-nemo-v4-base-11-from-10.diff.txt which while not a standard itself clearly believes that non-contiguous netmasks are valid, and is dated 2008. Earlier RFCs (950 and 1219) give them as valid but discouraged.
That's a draft for RFC 5177. In the RFC, all references to non-contiguous subnets have been removed.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5177
-- Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D. President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC <http://stutzbachenterprises.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090928/1887a254/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]