[Python-Dev] r83885 - in python/branches/py3k: Lib/re.py Lib/test/test_re.py Misc/NEWS (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon Aug 9 14:56:19 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] r83885 - in python/branches/py3k: Lib/re.py Lib/test/test_re.py Misc/NEWS
- Next message: [Python-Dev] r83885 - in python/branches/py3k: Lib/re.py Lib/test/test_re.py Misc/NEWS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:34:18 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Senthil Kumaran <orsenthil at gmail.com> wrote: > Do you know what needs to done for making Modules/Setup to reflect > the changes in Modules/Setup.dist in the buildbots? > On local checkouts, the compilation goes fine.
The buildbot checkout scripts should probably do that copy as a matter of course. There's no reason to support local modifications of Modules/Setup on the buildbots. Florent found out that removing Modules/Setup is done as part of the "clean" stage: http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/builders/i386%20Ubuntu%203.x/builds/1820/steps/clean/logs/stdio but the "clean" stage doesn't get run after a compile error: http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/waterfall?show=x86%20gentoo%203.x
In that case, once you get a clean run through on the buildbots (with the setup.py changes now in place), you should be OK to check the fnmatch and re changes back in.
Longer term, the buildbot setup should be modified to run the cleanup step even if the compilation step fails. I'm assume that is something Martin needs to set up.
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] r83885 - in python/branches/py3k: Lib/re.py Lib/test/test_re.py Misc/NEWS
- Next message: [Python-Dev] r83885 - in python/branches/py3k: Lib/re.py Lib/test/test_re.py Misc/NEWS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]