[Python-Dev] PEP 384 accepted (original) (raw)
"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Thu Dec 2 23:54:56 CET 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 accepted
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 accepted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
No, only the ones that didn't cause backwards incompatibilities, and broke existing packages. This is impossible. I can point you to some third party project that can break if you touch some distutils internals, like setuptools. Setuptools also uses some privates global variables in some other modules in the stdlib FYI.
So what would break if Extension accepted an abi= keyword parameter?
Lift the freeze. I'm all for replacing distutils with distutils2, but I'm not sure whether you will declare distutils2 ready tomorrow, next year, or ten years from now. Depends on what "ready" means.
Included in Python, so that changes become possible again.
If by ready you mean it can be used to replace Distutils1 in a project, I declare Distutils2 ready for usage NOW. It's in alpha stage. I want a solid beta before Pycon.
I would even remove Distutils from 3.x altogether at some point since setuptools is not Python 3 compatible, and just put distutils2. 3.3 sounds like a good target.
So will distuils2 be released before that? If so, when?
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 accepted
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 accepted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]