[Python-Dev] kill_python on windows buildbots (original) (raw)
David Bolen db3l.net at gmail.com
Tue Dec 7 16:11:58 CET 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] kill_python on windows buildbots (was Re: Stable buildbots)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] kill_python on windows buildbots
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tres Seaver <tseaver at palladion.com> writes:
Maybe belt-and-suspenders it in both places.
The clean batch file is also called from the build step, so relocating it there should maintain the existing behavior as well.
Hirokazu (ocean-city) pointed out in my new issue an earlier issue he created (#9973) that included a patch for such a change.
In thinking about it some more, I suppose there's still a small window for a loss of communication during a test which results in clean not being run (which could then block the next svn checkout without an opportunity to kill the processes), so maybe the right place is actually at the end of the test batch file which is the step during which such hung processes might get generated? I don't know the history, if any, of it's current location in the flow.
Relocating the use of kill_python seems reasonable to me, after which we could sort of wait and see if we run into any other hangs that interfere with the builds. I can't make such a change myself though.
-- David
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] kill_python on windows buildbots (was Re: Stable buildbots)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] kill_python on windows buildbots
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]