[Python-Dev] unittest: shortDescription, _TextTestResult and other issues (original) (raw)

Olemis Lang olemis at gmail.com
Wed Feb 10 16:04:43 CET 2010

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote:

On 10/02/2010 01:07, Ben Finney wrote:

Michael Foord<fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk>  writes:

On 09/02/2010 21:50, Ben Finney wrote:

I understood the point of ‘TestCase.shortDescription’, and indeed the point of that particular name, was to be clear that some other text could be the short description for the test case. Indeed, this is what you've come up with: a different implementation for generating a short description.

Given that the change broke something, and the desired effect can be gained with a different change, I don't really see a downside to the change I'm proposing (reverting shortDescription and moving the code that adds the test name to TestResult). What you describe (adding the class and method name when reporting the test) sounds like it belongs in the TestRunner, since it's more a case of “give me more information about the test result”. The code for giving information about individual test results is the TestResult. The TestRunner knows nothing about each individual result (or even about each individual test as it happens). The TestRunner is responsible for the whole test run, the TestCase runs individual tests and the TestResult reports (or holds) individual test results (at the behest of the TestCase). Given this structure it is not possible for test descriptions to be the responsibility of the TestRunner and I don't feel like re-structuring unittest today. :-)

FWIW

+1

-- Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article: Nabble - Trac Users - Embedding pages? - http://feedproxy.google.com/r/TracGViz-full/3/MWT7MJBi08w/Embedding-pages--td27358804.html

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list