[Python-Dev] topics I plan to discuss at the language summit (original) (raw)
Brian Curtin brian.curtin at gmail.com
Tue Jan 12 15:33:06 CET 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] topics I plan to discuss at the language summit
- Next message: [Python-Dev] topics I plan to discuss at the language summit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 04:20, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
Le Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:57:46 -0600, Brian Curtin a écrit : > > For example, there are currently over > 1500 open issues with no stage set, some of which seemingly haven't been > read by anyone at all.
I think most issues /have/ been read. It's just that for many of them, nobody is interested enough in or feels competent enough for fixing them. > Would a properly set stage field save issues from > falling into a black hole? I don't think this has anything to do with properly setting the stage field. We just have limited time and manpower. Perhaps one of our goals should be to reach out more to potential contributors.
Agreed, I didn't mean to place blame on the stage field, I just ran with how I view that field since it was mentioned. When I'm thinking in "code-writing developer mode" (tm), I'm more likely to go to issues which have a stage so I know what I'm going into -- what needs to be worked on. When I'm in project cleanup mode, I go by stageless issues -- what is necessary for this to begin or end work. Maybe others work differently...software projects take all kinds :-)
Anyways, sorry for the off-topic. If this is a summit worthy discussion, cool. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100112/cf466340/attachment-0007.htm>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] topics I plan to discuss at the language summit
- Next message: [Python-Dev] topics I plan to discuss at the language summit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]