[Python-Dev] PEP 391 - Please Vote! (original) (raw)

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Jan 14 12:46:19 CET 2010

Paul Moore wrote:

2010/1/14 Vinay Sajip <vinaysajip at yahoo.co.uk>:

So, can you please indicate your vote for or against incorporating PEP 391 into Python? I've no immediate need for the feature, but it would be good to have something like this, so I'm +1.

I'm in the same boat as Paul, but PEP 291 provides a nice forward compatible configuration scheme that will work with any application configuration approach that can produce an appropriate Python dictionary.

So +1 from me too - I think the PEP has now taken this as far as theorising can go, and the only way to learn anything further is to put it into practice.

Cheers, Nick.

-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list