[Python-Dev] Mercurial migration readiness (original) (raw)
Éric Araujo merwok at netwok.org
Sun Jul 4 14:41:36 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Mercurial migration readiness
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Mercurial migration readiness
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Not requiring any Mercurial extension to contribute to Python would be a nice policy to lower the entry bar.
That is already defeated by the need for the eol extension (which is now built-in in hg 1.6). Activating mq is something every developer should manage... Okay, make that “not requiring any third-party Mercurial extension” :) mq is anything but third-party.
Sorry, I didn’t want to imply that. What I meant was: Since eol is already a requirement, and since extensions provide tremendously useful things, it’s okay to require or recommend some of them.
MQ is in another category IMO not because it’s not shipped-with, since it is, but because it makes you think differently that regular Mercurial usage. (Not saying better or worse, just differently, thus a bit more difficult for would-be contributors.)
mq contains the strip command.
Which fits into regular Mercurial usage without requiring any MQ knowledge, agreed.
By the way, is eol a requirement for people using Windows tools with limitations only, or for every person that will clone Python?
Regards
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Mercurial migration readiness
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Mercurial migration readiness
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]