[Python-Dev] Licensing // PSF // Motion of non-confidence (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon Jul 5 23:37:26 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Licensing // PSF // Motion of non-confidence
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Licensing // PSF // Motion of non-confidence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
Normally we don't require contributor agreements for minor patches and other submissions, but given the attitude you have displayed here, I expect we'll make an exception for you (i.e. until you provide evidence of a change of heart by signing a contributor agreement, I'd consider any patches you provide to be on sufficiently legally dubious ground that we aren't in a position to accept them).
Sorry, that crack was uncalled for. You have made positive contributions to the language in the past, and hopefully will be willing and able to do so in the future. Just try to lose the attitude that everyone else is dumber than dirt.
Regards, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Licensing // PSF // Motion of non-confidence
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Licensing // PSF // Motion of non-confidence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]