[Python-Dev] python-checkins replies (original) (raw)
anatoly techtonik techtonik at gmail.com
Thu Jul 15 11:10:32 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] python-checkins replies
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Idle-dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
Given how high traffic python-checkins is I don't consider that a reasonable place to send follow-up and nor do I consider it the responsibility of committers to monitor it. As you said earlier this isn't in our standard dev procedures and nor do I think it should be. If you can't find an email address then either python-comitters or python-dev would be a better place to send feedback. Maybe reply-to on the checkin messages could be set to python-dev. Not sure if that's a mailman feature, though. I think this would be a good idea. It would be nice to have on-topic traffic here. :-)
+1 FWIW. It is a good practice to make code reviews public. It teaches people the proper ways and encourages to participate in reviews.
anatoly t.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] python-checkins replies
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Idle-dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]