[Python-Dev] Signs of neglect? (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Jun 26 04:59:31 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Signs of neglect?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Signs of neglect?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
2010/6/25 Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com>: I would call it more a sign of no tests rather than one of neglect and perhaps also an indication of the usefulness of those tools.
Less than useful tools with no tests probably qualify as neglected...
An assessment of the contents of the Py3k tools directory is probably in order, with at least a basic "will it run?" check added for those we decide to keep..
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Signs of neglect?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Signs of neglect?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]