[Python-Dev] Caching function pointers in type objects (original) (raw)
Reid Kleckner rnk at mit.edu
Wed Mar 3 04:06:41 CET 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Caching function pointers in type objects
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Caching function pointers in type objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I don't think this will help you solve your problem, but one thing we've done in unladen swallow is to hack PyType_Modified to invalidate our own descriptor caches. We may eventually want to extend that into a callback interface, but it probably will never be considered an API that outside code should depend on.
Reid
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
2010/3/2 Daniel Stutzbach <daniel at stutzbachenterprises.com>:
In CPython, is it safe to cache function pointers that are in type objects?
For example, if I know that sometype->tprichcompare is non-NULL, and I call it (which may execute arbitrary user code), can I assume that sometype->tprichcompare is still non-NULL? Not unless it's builtin. Somebody could have deleted the rich comparison methods. -- Regards, Benjamin
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/reid.kleckner%40gmail.com
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Caching function pointers in type objects
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Caching function pointers in type objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]