[Python-Dev] [PEP 3148] futures - execute computations asynchronously (original) (raw)
Jesse Noller jnoller at gmail.com
Fri Mar 5 22:42:51 CET 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [PEP 3148] futures - execute computations asynchronously
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [PEP 3148] futures - execute computations asynchronously
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Tres Seaver <tseaver at palladion.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jesse Noller wrote: On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Daniel Stutzbach <daniel at stutzbachenterprises.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Brian Quinlan <brian at sweetapp.com> wrote:
import futures +1 on the idea, -1 on the name. It's too similar to "from future import ...". Futures is a common term for this, and implemented named this in other languages. I don't think we should be adopting things that are common, and found elsewhere and then renaming them. - -1 to the name from me as well: it isn't "scoped" properly to make it clear what the module is about. If they were inside a pacakge named 'concurrency' or some such (as hinted by Jesse Noller, I think), the clash would go away.
If people agree with this; do you feel the proposal of said namespace should be a separate PEP, or piggy back on this? I don't want to piggy back on Brian's hard work.
Jesse
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [PEP 3148] futures - execute computations asynchronously
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [PEP 3148] futures - execute computations asynchronously
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]