[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r86355 - python/branches/py3k/Modules/_pickle.c (original) (raw)
Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com
Thu Nov 11 05:31:22 CET 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r86355 - python/branches/py3k/Modules/_pickle.c
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r86355 - python/branches/py3k/Modules/_pickle.c
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote:
... On the original question, I think it's preferable to keep compilers happy unless you're willing to require C99.
Hmm, maybe I should take another look at http://bugs.python.org/issue4805 .
Note that issue #10359 was not about any real compiler - it was about compiling with gcc -pedantic. If we require pedantic c89 compliance
- we should add -pedantic -std=c89 to the standard build flags. Otherwise no-compliant code will accumulate between "ISO C cleanups" and such cleanups will continue to pollute VC logs.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r86355 - python/branches/py3k/Modules/_pickle.c
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r86355 - python/branches/py3k/Modules/_pickle.c
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]