[Python-Dev] It is always loo late (Was: Relative imports in Py3k) (original) (raw)
anatoly techtonik techtonik at gmail.com
Wed Oct 13 15:55:03 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PPC Tiger buildbot going down for an upgrade
- Next message: [Python-Dev] It is always loo late (Was: Relative imports in Py3k)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:22 AM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote:
I don't see why such awkward way should be necessary in Python 3k, which breaks backwards compatibility. Why it can't "just work" for my user story? Because you weren't around advocating and implementing a change when Python 3 was developed?
I will never have the time to advocate the changes for products I don't use (do you?), and I still don't use Python 3 - I am just looking forward to it.
Is there a public list of annoyances for Python 3 that I can check to see if my change is already scheduled for Python 4 and vote for it?
It's too late now to arbitrarily break backward compatibility, so you'll have to advocate and develop any change inside the parameters of Python's normal backward compatibility policy.
I use Python a lot and I still can't change anything I dislike, because it is always too late.
In other words, you should move this discussion to python-ideas.
It is more about the development process than Python itself. Should I move to ideas? It is yet another ML I am not subscribed.
-- anatoly t.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PPC Tiger buildbot going down for an upgrade
- Next message: [Python-Dev] It is always loo late (Was: Relative imports in Py3k)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]