[Python-Dev] A new warning category? (original) (raw)

Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Fri Oct 15 19:23:11 CEST 2010

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:27, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote:

 On 15/10/2010 08:22, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

Brett Cannon writes:  >  As one of the co-authors of the PEP I say no. Procedural question: Doesn't authorship disqualify you from BDF1P, so you can't pronounce? I think Brett meant co-authorship of the moratorium PEP (which is already accepted). That's the way I took it as well.

And that is the way to take it. =)

The other factor here is that the moratorium was largely to help other implementations get back up to speed with CPython as they dealt with the transition to 3.x. Adding a new warning type isn't the kind of moving target that something like PEP 380 would be.

Exactly. This is especially true if the other VMs use warnings.py which will take care of all the details for them.

-Brett

Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list