[Python-Dev] Continuing 2.x (original) (raw)
Giampaolo Rodolà g.rodola at gmail.com
Fri Oct 29 21:56:37 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Continuing 2.x
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Continuing 2.x
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2010/10/29 Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>:
I had a brief conversation with Michael Foord yesterday and he's writing code that works in 2.4 through 3.2, so for some code bases, it's tricky and ugly, but possible.
If the application does not involve a lot of I/O, 2.4 -> 3.2 support by using a unique code base is possible and not that ugly. At least, that's what happened with psutil: http://code.google.com/p/psutil/issues/detail?id=75&can=1&q=python%203&colspec=ID%20Summary%20Type%20Opsys%20Status%20Milestone%20Opened%20Owner%20Progress#c9 My personal choice is to encourage the same approach where possible.
Regards,
--- Giampaolo http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib http://code.google.com/p/psutil
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Continuing 2.x
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Continuing 2.x
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]