[Python-Dev] Change to logging Formatters: support for alternative format styles (original) (raw)
Vinay Sajip vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk
Sun Oct 31 15:55:34 CET 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Change to logging Formatters: support for alternative format styles
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Change to logging Formatters: support for alternative format styles
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Olemis Lang <olemis gmail.com> writes:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry python.org> wrote: > I haven't played with it yet, but do you think it makes sense to add a > 'style' keyword argument to basicConfig()? That would make it pretty easy > to get the formatting style you want without having to explicitly > instantiate a Formatter, at least for simple logging clients. > Since this may be considered as a little sophisticated, I'd rather prefer these new classes to be added to configuration sections using fileConfig (and default behavior if missing), and still leave
basicConfig
unchanged (i.e. basic) .
Actually it's no biggie to have an optional style argument for basicConfig. People who don't use it don't have to specify it; the style argument would only apply if format was specified.
For some people, use of {} over % is more about personal taste than about the actual usage of str.format's flexibility; we may as well accommodate that preference, as it encourages in a small way the use of {}-formatting.
Regards,
Vinay Sajip
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Change to logging Formatters: support for alternative format styles
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Change to logging Formatters: support for alternative format styles
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]