[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #5863: Rewrite BZ2File in pure Python, and allow it to accept (original) (raw)
Georg Brandl g.brandl at gmx.net
Mon Apr 4 11:55:07 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #5863: Rewrite BZ2File in pure Python, and allow it to accept
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (merge 3.2 -> default): Merge fix for issue #11746
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 03.04.2011 23:28, schrieb Nadeem Vawda:
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:55:33 +0200 Éric Araujo <merwok at netwok.org> wrote:
I think we use Misc/ACKS for code+docs contribution like this one, Doc/ACKS.txt being used for doc-only changes. This second file is not comprehensive nor always used though, so maybe it should be superseded by the former.
Nadeem is already in Misc/ACKS. I don't know what the policy is for Doc/ACKS.txt, but since he added himself in the patch, I saw no good reason for reverting the change. I added myself because I assumed the policy for Doc/ACKS.txt to be the same as the policy for Misc/ACKS - if you submit a patch, add your name. Looking at the devguide, though, I can't find any mention of Doc/ACKS.txt. +1 for merging these files by the way. Sounds good to me. The intro at the top of Misc/ACKS is pretty broad, thanking people for all contributions (not just code). Unless there's some plan to split the documentation off into a separate repository, I can't think of any reason not to merge them.
If we can get Misc/ACKS in a format that is includable in reST, I would be +1 for a merger. (That way we can still list acknowledgements in the docs.)
Georg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #5863: Rewrite BZ2File in pure Python, and allow it to accept
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (merge 3.2 -> default): Merge fix for issue #11746
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]